Millstones Are The Remedy
What is being done to our children is simply evil. For years, they have gone after children before they were born, calling it “pro choice”. Then last year, the AMA, CDC and FDA demanded we mask our kids and many private sector corporations, as well as School Boards followed suit with relish. Now they are killing kids post-birth with COVID-19 vaccines!
It’s not like Big Pharma doesn’t already have a long history of introducing poisons and calling them vaccines. And one wonders at the growing rates of autism, cancer and other long-term diseases, not only with children, but the general population at large. If one ever needed a large long-term case study showing vaccines to be a fraud, one needs to look no further than the Amish communities.
KJV Matt 18:6 But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.
KJV Luke 17:2 It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.
The only basis for an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is when there are no alternatives available. But many of us know full well that Nature indeed has remedies, wormwood among others, and long proven remedies like Ivermectin, HCQ etc. Doctors like Dr Zehlenko, Dr Simone Gold, Dr Stella Emmanuel and many others have produced studies showing the efficacy of alternative, cost-effective protocols, yet were suppressed, ignored and even threatened with loss of jobs/license and with the help of Big tech, censored. Why? These cures are not profitable to Big Pharma as their plans for subscription-based vaccine and boosters every 6 months.
When elected, along with other America Firsters in Congress, we will ensure that those who planned this genocide will be held to account. Those who knowingly injure children will be dealt with and removed from society, no ifs, ands, or buts. Justice can only be ensured by capital punishment for those who knowingly caused this evil.
While financial compensation will never be adequate for injuries and deaths. We will legislate laws that allow victims and families to seek 3X damages in compensation from Big Pharma, liability waivers notwithstanding (waivers were received under false pretenses and fraud vitiates everything). Likewise, government officials shall lose indemnities and be personally liable for their part in any violation of our Constitutional Rights. The objective here is that one’s liberties and rights shall not be trifled with under the color of law.
Knowingly Authorizing Harm
From the New American, FDA: “We’re Never Going to Learn About How Safe the Vaccine for Children Is Until We Start Giving It”.
The Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met on Tuesday to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children five through 11 years of age (full recording is available here).
While the committee endorsed the shot in a 17-0 vote, one FDA panelist, Dr. Eric Rubin, made some unsettling remarks in regard to vaccines’ safety, saying, verbatim, “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it goes.”
This is an unacceptable! It’s like saying “We’ll never know how safe a 747 is until we start loading them with 500 passengers at a time.”
The FDA, full 7 hour, 30 minute video here, discussed the ramifications of authorizing vaccines for children ages 5 – 16 and yet were willing to subject them to a global clinical trial under the aegis of a governmental mandate. Certain quotes from this hearing should alarm any parent that loves and wants the best for their children.
- Dr Rubin noted:
This is a much tougher one, I think, than we had expected coming into it. The data show that this vaccine works and it’s pretty safe.… And yet, we’re worried about a side effect that we can’t measure yet, but it’s probably real. And we see a benefit that isn’t the same as it is in older patients. It’s a very, sort of, personal choice. If I had a child who was a transplant recipient, I would really want to be able to use a vaccine. And there are certain kids who probably should be vaccinated. The question of how broadly to use I think is a substantial one. And I know it’s not a question, and I know we’re kind of punting that to ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC]. But I do think that it’s a relatively close call…. It really is going to be a question of what the prevailing conditions are. But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like coronavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it.
But wait, there’s more…
- Dr. Fiona Havers of the CDC admitts there are no studies on the long-term outcomes of the vaccine in children (1:03:22), as there is not information available on the vaccinated children’s chances of reinfection (1:05:44).
- Dr. Matthew Oster, a pediatric cardiologist, commenting on the data available on vaccinated adolescents, outlined the higher chances of young male vaccine recipients having higher chances of developing heart inflammation than their unvaccinated peers (1:11:26). In females, the risk of developing myocarditis following vaccination was lower than in males, yet still exceeded the “background incidence.” At the same time, the chances of adolescents developing myocarditis due to COVID were significantly lower compared to them developing the condition due to vaccination (1:20:13).
- As of October 21, COVID-19 death rate in children ages 5-11 represented 0.03 percent of all COVID-19 deaths in the United States, 0.008 percent of total COVID-19 cases, and 0.0005 percent of deaths among the entire U.S. population. The age group of 0-17 years made up for 0.0000002 percent deaths by total COVID-19 cases, according to the CDC data that was presented during the discussion (4:43:49).
- The safety data on the Pfizer shot for children, based on “at least two months of follow-ups,” showed, according to the FDA (2:20:01), that no recipients developed any of the “adverse events of special interest,” including myocarditis/pericarditis, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, and appendicitis.
Foreknowledge?
- Why did the FDA Approve First Oral Blood Thinning Medication for Children on 21 July 2021? When did they know there would be a need for something so rare in nature?
- Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved Pradaxa (dabigatran etexilate) oral pellets to treat children 3 months to less than 12 years old with venous thromboembolism (a condition where blood clots form in the veins) directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least five days. The FDA also approved Pradaxa oral pellets to prevent recurrent clots among patients 3 months to less than 12 years old who completed treatment for their first venous thromboembolism.In addition, Pradaxa was approved in capsule form to treat blood clots in patients eight years and older with venous thromboembolism directly after they have been treated with a blood thinner given by injection for at least five days, and to prevent recurrent clots in patients eight years and older who completed treatment for their first venous thromboembolism.
- On cue, Fake News, USAToday — Blood Thinner & Pfizer Vaccine Not Related, rushes to factcheck our natural and logical conclusion that this is to treat the myocarditis cases stemming from the Pfizer vaccine: (They really think we’re stupid)
- In the days following the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s first full approval of a COVID-19 vaccine, false claims about the agency and the safety of the shot spread on social media.An Aug. 23 Instagram post claims there’s a connection between the FDA’s approval of a blood thinner designed for children and Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccine.”Just in time to clean up the damage from the ‘clot shot’ that will be mandated shortly …” the caption of the post reads. “Sell the problem, sell the solution.“The image in the post is a screenshot of a June 21 article from MedPage Today about the FDA’s approval of a drug for treating and preventing blood clots in children. Other versions of the post have accrued thousands of shares on Facebook.
- The Exposé Article, CORRUPTION: FDA Committee members who approved Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine for Children have financial ties to Pfizer. The following list outlines which FDA vaccine advisory committee board members are compromised and how:
- Acting Chair Arnold S. Monto was a paid consultant at Pfizer as recently as 2018.
- Steve Pergam received the Pfizer “vaccine” and was featured getting and promoting it by the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle.
- Committee member Archana Chatterjee worked on a research project involving vaccines for infants that took place from 2018-2020 and was sponsored by Pfizer.
- Myron Levine has mentored numerous U.S. post-doctoral fellows, and one of his proteges is Raphael Simon, Pfizer’s senior director of vaccine research and development.
- James Hildreth, a temporary voting member, made a financial interest disclosure stating that he accepted $1.5 million while serving as president at Meharry Medical College, which administers Pfizer’s covid injections.
- Geeta K. Swamy chairs the “Independent Data Monitoring Committee for the Pfizer Group B Streptococcus Vaccine Program,” which is sponsored by Pfizer. Swamy was also listed by Duke University as “a co-investigator for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trial.”
- Gregg Sylvester used to work as vice president at Pfizer Vaccines where he launched numerous vaccines for the company, including one for children.
- A number of other “temporary voting members,” including Ofer Levy of Boston Children’s Hospital, Eric Rubin, Jay Portnoy and Melinda Wharton, are all outspoken in their support for injecting children with Pfizer’s covid jabs.
“FDA advisory committee members in the past have frequently been the target of heavy politicking by industry representatives of whatever drug they were considering for a recommendation at in-person meetings,” reported FDANews back in December.
Redefining “Vaccination” to achieve their depopulation agenda
From the excellent law blogger, TechnoFog; CDC Emails: Our Definition of Vaccine is “Problematic”, as a result of a FOIA, we find that the CDC was panicked by “rightwinger vax deniers” decided to change the definition of “vaccination”. As he writes:
The CDC caused an uproar in early September 2021, after it changed its definitions of “vaccination” and “vaccine.” For years, the CDC had set definitions for vaccination/vaccine that discussed immunity. This all changed on September 1, 2021…
To many observers, it appeared the CDC changed the definitions because of the waning effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. For example, the effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine falls over time, with an Israeli study reported in August 2021 as showing the vaccine being “only 16% effective against symptomatic infection for those individuals who had two doses of the shot back in January.” The CDC recognizes the waning effectiveness, thus explaining their promotion of booster shots.
Of course, the usual suspects defended the CDC. The Washington Post, for example, cast doubt that the CDC changed the definition because of issues with the COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC tried to downplay the change, stating “slight changes in wording over time … haven’t impacted the overall definition.”
Internal CDC E-Mails
(click any image to enlarge)
Rightwingers claiming mRNA is not a vaccine
CDC request to change definition of vaccine
CDC approval to change definition of vaccine
CDC emails we obtained via the Freedom of Information Act reveal CDC worries with how the performance of the COVID-19 vaccines didn’t match the CDC’s own definition of “vaccine”/“vaccination”. The CDC’s Ministry of Truth went hard at work in the face of legitimate public questions on this issue.
US Representative Thomas Massie joined the fray by tweeting the following: If only we had more fighters like him, unlike our Iowa RINOs that tow the CDC propaganda (lies).
CDC Definitions — 10 July 2012 https://web.archive.org/web/20120710132002/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Immunization: The process by which a person or animal becomes protected against a disease. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Vaccination: Injection of a killed or weakened infectious organism in order to prevent the disease.
Vaccine: A product that produces immunity therefore protecting the body from the disease. Vaccines are administered through needle injections, by mouth and by aerosol.
CDC Definitions — 14 February 2015 https://web.archive.org/web/20150214043055/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce immunity to a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
CDC Definitions — 02 September 2021 https://web.archive.org/web/20210902194040/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Immunity: Protection from an infectious disease. If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but some can be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.
Vaccination: The act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce protection from a specific disease.
Immunization: A process by which a person becomes protected against a disease through vaccination. This term is often used interchangeably with vaccination or inoculation.
Conclusion, Prove Me Wrong
We’re not falling for that deception
Word games; “protection” is NOT “immunity”. By changing the definition of vaccination, the CDC is setting the stage for never-ending booster shots to “protect from a specific variant of COVID-19”.
The AMA, CDC and other agencies, in collusion with Big Pharma are out of control and must be brought to heel. Immunity from liability must be stripped from all parties involved in the immunization scam. Mind you, the Covid-19 scamdemic only exposed their corruption which in reality dates all the way back to the dawning of the 20th century.
Never again, can we allow a single conglomerate unrestricted power to define and set “health policy”, we must have alternative medical voices and must be free to use our God-given autonomy to determine our health options, regardless of what our ‘government’ thinks.
As your Senate representative to DC, I will fight to breakup the unholy alliance between Big Pharma, Insurance and Healthcare providers to restore the QUALITY OF HEALTHCARE.
###